When the Body Says No: The Experience of Vaginismus and the Validity of Female Pain


Georgia Haire


Vaginismus first entered medical discourse in 1861 when Dr J Marion Sims linked symptoms of vaginal hypersensitivity to muscular spasms. Today, vaginismus is similarly defined by the NHS characterised as an involuntary tightening of muscles around the vagina whenever penetration is attempted. Although these medical descriptions do not encapsulate every experience of the condition, it is generally agreed that the condition makes penetration near impossible, and very painful. The use of tampons, penetrative intercourse, cervical examinations, and other activities become sources of shame and fear for sufferers. Vaginismus is neglected as it is an underdiagnosed condition, which sufferers often must treat themselves, away from medical support. It is contested by doctors, who do not believe that there is anything wrong with the sufferer. By taking the experience of vaginismus as my starting point, I argue that the medical response to vaginismus is shaped by wider cultural perceptions about the believability of female pain. Female pain is viewed not as fact, but as a misinterpretation of bodily events. This article highlights the issues that surround the disbelief of female pain in relation to vaginismus, and how such perceptions might be altered. 
Key words: vaginismus, sexual pain disorders, sexual practice, women's medicine, heteronormativity 


Author Biography

Georgia Haire, University of Kent

Georgia Haire is a PhD candidate in the Centre for the History of Medicine, Ethics and Medical Humanities at the University of Kent. Her thesis project examines false teeth and oral health in Britain during the mid-twentieth century.