Unresolved Grief and the Pull of the Dead in Joyce’s ‘Eveline’: An Interpretation Using Attachment Theory


Linda Horsnell


This paper uses Attachment Theory as a frame of reference to critically analyse James Joyce’s representation of the eponymous character Eveline in Dubliners.  By reference to the work of Alexander Shand, it is possible to highlight the correlative relationship between creative writing and the theory of grief espoused by attachment theorist John Bowlby.  Joyce’s understanding of human behaviour and the sociological, domestic and psychological information contained within his work leave it particularly open to critical analysis using such methodology.  I will show how attachment theory offers an alternative reading to those based on Freudian and Lacanian paradigms.  


Author Biography

Linda Horsnell, University of East Anglia

Linda Horsnell is a PhD Candidate and Associate Tutor in the department of Literature, Drama and Creative Writing.  Her field of study is the representation of grief in the works of James Joyce.


  1. Archer, John, The Nature of Grief: The Evolution and Psychology of Reactions to Loss (London: Routledge, 1999)
  2. —— ‘Theories of Grief: Past, Present, and Future Perspectives’, in Handbook of Bereavement and Research Practice: Advances in Theory and Intervention, ed. by Margaret S. Stroebe, Robert O. Hansson, Henk Schut and Wolfgang Stroebe (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2008), 45–65
  3. Bowlby, John, Attachment and Loss, 3 vols (London: Hogarth Press, 1969–80; repr. London: Penguin, 1991), I (1969)
  4. —— The Making and Breaking of Affectional Bonds (London: Tavistock Publications, 1979; repr. London: Routledge, 2007)
  5. Brandabur, Edward, A Scrupulous Meanness: A Study of Joyce’s Early Work (Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press, 1971)
  6. A Companion to James Joyce, ed. by Richard Brown (Oxford: Blackwell, 2008)
  7. Costello, Peter, James Joyce: The Years of Growth 1882–1915 (West Cork: Roberts Rinehart, 1992)
  8. Culpeper, Jonathan, Language and Characterisation: People in Plays and Other Texts (Edinburgh: Pearson Education, 2001)
  9. Evans, Dylan, An Introductory Dictionary of Lacanian Psychoanalysis (Sussex: Routledge, 1986)
  10. Field, Nigel P., ‘Whether to Relinquish or Maintain a Bond with the Deceased’, in Handbook of Bereavement and Research Practice: Advances in Theory and Intervention, ed. by Margaret S. Stroebe, Robert O. Hansson, Henk Schut and Wolfgang Stroebe (Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, 2008), 113–132
  11. Freud, Sigmund, Inhibitions, Symptoms and Anxiety, trans. by Alix Strachey, ed. and rev. by James Strachey (London: Hogarth, 1936; rev. edn. 1961)
  12. —— ‘Psychoanalysis’ and ‘Libido Theory’, ed. by Adam Phillips, in The Penguin Freud Reader (London: Penguin, 2006), 106–131
  13. Holmes, Jeremy, John Bowlby and Attachment Theory, The Makers of Modern Psychotherapy Series (London: Routledge, 1993; repr. Hove: Brunner-Routledge, 2004)
  14. Howe, David, Attachment Across the Lifecourse: A Brief Introduction (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011)
  15. Ingersoll, Earl G., Engendered Trope in Joyce’s Dubliners (Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press, 1996)
  16. James Joyce: The Critical Heritage, ed. by Robert H. Deming, 2 vols. (London: Routledge, 1970)
  17. Jameson, Fredric, The Political Unconscious: Narrative as a Socially Symbolic Act (Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 1981)
  18. Jones, Robert S. P., ‘Language, Form and Emotion in James Joyce’s Portrait of an Artist as a Young Man: A Literary Analysis’, Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 8 (2017), 158–163 <http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.alls.v.8n.5p.158>
  19. Joyce, James, Dubliners (London: Grant Richards, 1914; repr. Hertfordshire: Wordsworth, 1993)
  20. —— Ulysses, ed. by Hans Walter Gabler, Wolfhard Steppe and Claus Melchior (Paris: Shakespeare and Co., 1922; edited edn, London: Bodley Head, 1986; repr. 2002)
  21. Kershner, R. Brandon, Joyce, Bakhtin and Popular Literature: Chronicles of Disorder (Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press, 1989)
  22. Leonard, Garry, Reading Dubliners Again: A Lacanian Perspective (Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press, 1993)
  23. Mitchell, Stephen A., ‘The Origin and Nature of the “Object” in the Theories of Klein and Fairbairn’, Contemporary Psychoanalysis, 17 (1981), 374–398 <https://doi.org/10.1080/00107530.1981.10745670>
  24. Parkes, Colin Murray, Bereavement: Studies of Grief in Adult Life, 3rd edn (London: Penguin, 1988)
  25. Pierce, David, Reading Joyce (Harlow: Pearson Longman, 2008)
  26. Power, Arthur, Conversations with James Joyce (London: Millington, 1974; repr. with corrections, Dublin: Lilliput Press, 1999)
  27. Scholes, Robert, ‘Semiotic Approaches to a Fictional Text: Joyce’s “Eveline”’, James Joyce Quarterly, 16.2 (1978/9), 65–80
  28. Sharoni, Josephine, ‘The Failure of the Parental Metaphor: A Lacanian Reading of James Joyce’s “Eveline”’, Journal of Modern Literature, 39.4 (2016), 33–48 <https://doi.org/10.2979/jmodelite.39.4.04>
  29. Tindall, William York, A Reader’s Guide to James Joyce (New York, NY: Farrar, Straus & Giroux 1959; repr. 1978)
  30. Torchiana, Donald T., Backgrounds for Joyce’s Dubliners (Boston, Mass.: Allen and Unwin, 1986)