Communication and Collective Mentality: Pathways of Mobilisation in Colonial America


Megan Elizabeth King


The political upheaval that comprised the American Revolutionary era instigated a new social, political, and intellectual consciousness which ultimately shaped an inclusive national identity for colonists from New Hampshire to Georgia.  In order to comprehend the depth of such a transformative historical event, it is critical to examine the extensive process that emboldened the colonists, leading them from reluctant opposition to legitimised resistance and finally to the establishment of an organized network which aired American grievances and advertised protests, boycotts, and public denouncements of those deemed unpatriotic.  By evaluating the radical developments of the Imperial Crisis via the lens of contemporary scholarship on radicalisation and mobilisation, historians can gain an improved perspective on exactly how eighteenth-century Americans were able to transform mass congregation into a means of political influence. As the study of extremism has been brought to the forefront in recent years, scholars have come to consider radicalisation as a process comprised of discrete developmental phases in which an individual acquires and demonstrates beliefs, feelings, and actions in support of any given group or cause in conflict.  With regard to Colonial America, friendships, networks, and committees of correspondence not only moulded a collective mentality, but additionally enabled individuals who previously had no significant role in political affairs to actively participate in local decision-making processes.  The Patriot movement burgeoned as a direct result of the fact that they were able to provide discontented and disadvantaged citizens with hope for the future and a definite degree of insurance against misfortune for the present.


Author Biography

Megan Elizabeth King, University of Kent

In receiving a Master’s of Historical Research at the University of Stirling, a Postgraduate Certificate from the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism (START) based at the University of Maryland at College Park, and a baccalaureate degree from Lock Haven University of Pennsylvania, Megan has completed nearly a decade of specialized research in history, political science, and social psychology.  As a PhD student at the University of Kent, her current project focuses on the process of radicalization in Revolutionary America and the mechanisms of mobilization utilized by Patriot organizations. 


  1. Newspapers Consulted
  2. Boston Gazette and Country Journal
  3. Massachusetts Gazette and Boston News Letter
  4. New England Chronicle
  5. All Other Texts
  6. Adams, John, and Jonathan Sewell, Novanglus and Massachusettensis, or, Political Essays Published in the Years 1774 and 1775 on the Principal Points of Controversy between Great Britain and Her Colonies (Boston: Hews and Goss, 1819)
  7. Chenoweth, Erica, ‘Political Mobilization and Institutions’, in The Routledge Handbook of Comparative Political Institutions, ed. by Jennifer Gandhi and Ruben Ruiz-Rufino (New York: Routledge, 2015), pp. 362-376
  8. Clemens, Elizabeth, ‘Organizational Repertoires and Institutional Change: Women’s Groups and the Transformation of U.S. Politics, 1890-1920’, American Journal of Sociology, 98.4 (1993), 755-798, [accessed 15 January 2019]
  9. Davidson, Philip, Propaganda and the American Revolution, 1763-1783 (New York: W.W. Norton & Company, 1973)
  10. Hoffman, Bruce, Inside Terrorism (New York: Columbia University Press, 1998)
  11. Jasko, Katarzyna, Gary LaFree and Arie Kruglanski, ‘Quest for Significance and Violent Extremism: The Case of Domestic Radicalization’, Political Psychology, 38.5 (2016), 815-831, [accessed 15 January 2019]
  12. Kruglanski, A. W., M. Crenshaw, J. M. Post and J. Victoroff, ‘What Should This Fight Be Called?: Metaphors of Counterterrorism and Their Implications’, Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8.3 (2007), 97-133, [accessed 15 January 2019]
  13. Leary, Mark. R., Jean M. Twenge and Erin Quinlivan, ‘Interpersonal Rejection as a Determinant of Anger and Aggression’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10.2 (2006), 111-132, [accessed 26 February 2019]
  14. Maier, Pauline, ‘The Townshend Acts and the Consolidation of Colonial Resistance’, in Major Problems in the Era of the American Revolution 1760-1791 Volume II, ed. by Richard Brown (Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 2000), pp. 128-136
  15. McCauley, Clark and Sophia Moskalenko, Friction: How Radicalization Happens to Them and Us (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011)
  16. Middlekauff, Robert, The Glorious Cause: The American Revolution, 1763-1789 (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1985)
  17. O’Shaughnessy and Andrew Jackson, The Men Who Lost America: British Leadership, The American Revolution, and the Fate of the Empire (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2013)
  18. Raphael, Ray, The First American Revolution: Before Lexington and Concord (New York: The New Press, 2003)
  19. ———, ‘Yankees With Staves and Musick’, Phi Kappa Phi Forum, 86.3 (2006), 23-26
  20. Shalev, Eran, ‘Ancient Masks, American Fathers: Classical Pseudonyms During the American Revolution and Early Republic’, Journal of the Early Republic, 23 (2003), 151-172, [accessed 15 January 2019]
  21. Simi, Peter, Bryan Bubolz, Hillary McNeel, Karyn Sporer and Steven Windisch, ‘Trauma as a Precursor to Violent Extremism: How Non-Ideological Factors Can Influence Joining an Extremist Group’, in Research Brief (College Park, MD: START, 2015), pp. 1-2, [accessed 30 January].
  22. Wood, Gordon S., The Radicalism of the American Revolution (New York: A.A. Knopf, 2002)